ABG All Board Games
Master Of Economy box art
Rich game profile

Master Of Economy

Financial simulator. Players start the game by managing their corporations (1 of 4) and using them as a tool for increasing the value of private property (like countries in "Imperial"). By effective speculation on the stock market, a player may take control of more than one corpo...

Players

2-4

Time

?-?

Age

14+

Weight

4.07

Rating

6.77

Should this hit the table?

Quick read before the metadata.

The game Master of Economy has a high level of direct confrontation and strategic depth in confrontation. Players need to be aware of and react to each other's strategies frequently. However, there is less emphasis on cooperation in the game. Overall, the game has a good level of player interaction.

Teach 2.1

Teaching signal

Replay 3.8

High replayability

Interaction 3.8

Highly interactive

Scaling 3.8

Scales well

Strategy 4.6

Deep strategy

Control 4.3

More strategic control

Table feel

The game Master of Economy has a high level of direct confrontation and strategic depth in confrontation. Players need to be aware of and react to each other's strategies frequently. However, there is less emphasis on cooperation in the game. Overall, the game has a good level of player interaction.

Replay value

Master of Economy offers a high level of variability with its gameboard and expansions, allowing for different experiences each time it is played. The game provides deep strategic possibilities and room for improvement in player strategy. It scales well with different numbers of players and has a moderate level of easiness to learn. Overall, it has a good replayability score of 7.6.

Luck profile

The final luck score for Master of Economy is 8.67 out of 10. This indicates that the game has minimal randomness impact, with random elements having a minimal influence on the game outcome. Players have substantial ability to mitigate randomness through strategic decisions and planning. The game outcome is primarily determined by player strategy and decisions, with luck playing a minor role.

Overview

What ABG knows about this game

Financial simulator. Players start the game by managing their corporations (1 of 4) and using them as a tool for increasing the value of private property (like countries in "Imperial"). By effective speculation on the stock market, a player may take control of more than one corporation. Proper corporation management is preferable but not the most essential. The rules attempt to simulate real conditions of business competition and relationships between shareholders. THERE IS NO LUCK FACTOR. Internal balance discourages to play in a relation of 2(3) players versus 1. Most of the rules are quite easy and intuitive. It is the most difficult to use the rules effectively by good planning and predicting opponents’ plans. Players manage their corporations by investing in new factories and trading produced goods to earn money (like in many other games). The point is what the players do with earned money. They can re-invest it to make their corporations earn more during next phase or try to make pressure on another player by buying shares of his/her corporation. The player who has the biggest number of shares can be elected by voting as a new leader of the corporation for the next stage. Even if you don`t have enough shares to take control over another player`s firm, the investment can be quite beneficiary because it can give you some profit (if that firm is managed well) or enforce your opponent to use the corporation money for defending, which makes his final result worse than could be achieved without your pressure. Of course, the more players (max 4), the more fun there is during voting phase when all the shareholders, who are going to manage the corporation in the next stage, vote. The game tries to extract maximum advantage of double circulation of money you can find in the "Imperial". Players have money and corporations have money. So, what is new then? Besides the players, also the corporations can be shareholders and they all (corporations and players) vote for new leaders. It means that if you want to keep control over a corporation you had started with, you can, for instance, first take control over some weaker corporation which has some shares of yours. The best defense is attack, isn`t it? ;) The only weapon in this war is money. There are some tools of defense, so taking control over experienced opponent`s corporation is rather difficult, though possible. When an experienced player plays versus a beginner, he/she shouldn`t have a problem with it. Moreover, keeping control of the corporation is useful, because it is a way of generating money for the leader, although speculating by buying and selling shares is a bit more efficient. It is the best to go both ways at the same time, choosing and changing your engagement alternately. Well, it is also possible to play without any corporation and increase the value of private property only by playing as a stock market profiteer, but this way is recommended only for very experienced players. There is a fixed variant of playing 2 vs. 2.

Media

Images and visual references

Images, galleries, and videos are grouped here so the page feels visual before every asset is fully hosted.

No media imported yet.

Editions

Versions and regional releases

Edition Year Language Publisher / Region
No editions imported yet.

Files and documents

Rules, aids, translations

No files imported yet.

Commerce mapping

Buying signals

No commerce mappings imported yet.

Credits

People and publishers

Linked items

Graph expansion queue

Related games and expansions help build a connected catalog around every title.

No linked items imported yet.